Attorney Thomas Renz reportedly discovered that the Department of Defense is altering data to hide the number of service members injured by the experimental COVID-19 shots.
First and foremost, herein is notice regarding critical evidence related to COVID-19, potential governmental corruption, and the safety of our military and citizens. We would like to thank Make Americans Free Again for their assistance in ensuring this document is provided to every congressperson, governor, state attorney general, and as many other elected officials as possible throughout the nation. By putting this document in the hands of every previously mentioned elected official we are demanding they look at the facts and take a stand. We need accountability and redress of grievance NOW!
This document includes a substantial amount of evidence. While we believe it should be analyzed in its entirety, we have included overview documents that provide bullet-point information on critical items for easy reference (see the Table of Contents).
Second, this document helps arm ‘We The People’ with the ability to argue facts at school board meetings, town councils and any forum are giving the ability to speak at. Take this document, print it out, make copies and distribute it to as many people as you can. We will put EVERY elected official and person involved in Covid-19 on notice!
Read the full document HERE.
Renz discusses the lack of informed consent in this clip:
Thomas Renz – Attorney.
“VaCCinE Manufacturers Hid The Risks From The Public – Millions Received The VaCCinEs Without Informed Consent”
THIS IS A MUST LISTEN.. (FACT) pic.twitter.com/PHalKCpe4j
— Jimmy 🩸54 (@cawthorme) March 25, 2022
Renz has the sworn statements of four DoD whistleblowers serving as Army medical officer who have reviewed the relevant information and corroborated critical medical data had been altered, Emerald Robinson reports.
All of them had access to the relevant database — called the Defense Medical Epidemiological Database (“DMED”) — and they independently verified the findings.
What did they find?
They found dramatic increases in serious conditions after vaccination: a 456% increase in acute myocardial infarction, a 468% increase in pulmonary embolism, a 296% increase in all cancers, a 275% increase in myocarditis.
The Department of Defense responded to these whistleblower accounts by claiming that the increases in illness were actually false — due to “previously unreported” errors in the DMED database itself:
Following the exposé, the DOD responded with a statement that the dramatic spike in disease and medical conditions in DOD personnel immediately following the vaccine rollout in DOD was purely coincidental, and the result of a previously unannounced “glitch” in its DMED database, and had nothing to do with the vaccines themselves. The DOD maintains that the database glitch resulted in artificially low incidence numbers in the years 2016-2020, but that the 2021 data is accurate.
According to the whistleblowers, the DoD then took the entire DMED database offline and fraudulently altered the information on the database. Here’s what happened in their own words:
The Department of Defense (DoD) responded that the increases in rates of illness and disease reported by Renz were due to a “glitch” in DMED. The DMED was then taken offline for some time. After DMED was put back online, query reports showed large changes to data queries for the 2016 through 2020 date range.
Tracking down the glitch reveals an unexplained change of data that can be observed in Medical Surveillance Monthly Reports (MSMR) published openly online. The May 2021 MSMR displays annual summaries of major diagnostic categories of ambulatory and hospitalization reports from 2016, 2018, and 2020. These major diagnostic categories are defined as the categories with the greatest number of reported events and constitute the vast majority of medical diagnoses. When comparing the numbers of ambulatory reports to the May 2019 MSMR (which displays summaries from 2014, 2016, and 2018), the totals for these diagnostic categories for 2016 and 2018 were substantially revised to display increases in all forms ofillness by an average of 17.5% (16.3% after excluding one category called “Other” that included a change in definition). Presumably these changes took place for all data from 2016 through 2020. Strangely, no such large revisions were made to hospitalization data, which would be expected if the revisions were due to a large cache of “lost and found” patient reports in which a proportion of the conditions resulted in hospitalization.
A review of the past decade of MSMR reports show a small handful of revisions larger than 2%, with nearly all changes in summary data far smaller than 1%. No major systemic data revisions were observed prior to the May 2021 MSMR. At the time of this report, no explanation was given for the massive changes in health data that would surely affect biomedical studies on these diagnostic categories. Best practices would dictate a detailed explanation for large and sudden changes—particularly as it pertains to one of the world’s most important medical databases. Further, the changes in all but one of the 16 major diagnostic categories fit the changes observed from queries performed after the DMED was put back online, purportedly to fix the “glitch”. This leads me to believe that the DMED “glitch” clearly corresponds to the large revisions that appeared in the May 2021 MSMR.
Further, and perhaps more disturbing, the data revisions are not randomly distributed as one might expect of “lost and found” reports added to a system, or many methods for recalibrating report definitions. These revisions are most prominent in the categories most heavily researched as injuries or adverse events associated with the COVID-19 quasi-vaccines, including those that Renz spoke about in the January 24 hearing.
There are enough signs to conclude with a high probability that the large-scale MSMR revisions published in May 2021 and associated DMED alterations made in January 2022 were made to mask illness data from early 2021 associated with vaccine rollouts, and likely fraudulent. An examination of the data should quickly reveal whether this is the case.
Renz explains here how Big Pharma colluded with the federal government to redefine mRNA gene therapies as conventional vaccines:
Attorney Thomas Renz. Pf1zer and [email protected] have admitted that mRNA [email protected] are gene therapy and not [email protected] but have recently redefined “[email protected]” so that this bi0-swill meets the definition. pic.twitter.com/0iUjUsChzu
— BoxerRebellion777 (@BRebellion777) March 28, 2022
The U.S. federal government knows its medical data clearly show the experimental COVID-19 shots are the most dangerous drug ever given to the American people.
As Robinson reported, the DOJ is hiring tort lawyers to defend HHS from vaccine injury cases.
The house of cards is on the brink of collapse, and the government knows it.